The BBC's performance has been so lamentable that I could complain every day about the way pro-Brexit interviewees are allowed to spout their lies on programme after programme without even a token challenge.
But I've finally lost patience, and written to them again:
Last night a journalist was killed in N Ireland as Brexit
undermines the peace process, and unfortunately the BBC has played its part in
this sorry state of affairs by failing to expose systematic lying by pro-Brexit
speakers on its news and current affairs programmes.
Day after day, they are allowed to spout that the UK has to
leave the EU because 'people voted for it'. (Most of them have by now given up
any pretence that Brexit has any benefits.)
I used to work for the BBC as well as other broadcasting
organisations, and I would have been asking these interviewees:
1. Why should we have to obey the result of a referendum
that was won by lying, cheating and criminality?
2. Why should we have to obey the result of a referendum in
which voters were promised a Brexit that is not being and cannot be delivered?
3. Why are we pretending we have to obey the result of a
referendum that was explicitly non-binding and advisory?
I have heard many, many Brexiters being interviewed on your
programmes, but I have NEVER heard one of your interviewers putting these
points. Why is that? Is it because they are ignorant of the facts or is it
because an edict has come from on high forbidding them from raising these
inconvenient facts. If it is the latter, from whom does it come?
No comments:
Post a Comment