Showing posts with label chemical. Show all posts
Showing posts with label chemical. Show all posts
Monday, 30 September 2013
Chemical weapons
So the UN inspectors now have the taks of destroying 1,000 tonnes of Syrian chemical weapons. Such weapons were first banned by the Hague convention of 1899.
This relatively new rule book, though, was not enough to stop them being used during World War One, first by Germany, and then the Allies. They killed at least 90,000 soldiers.
During the 1930’s they were deployed by the Italians in Ethiopia and the Japanese in China. In the later stages of World War Two, President Roosevelt was advised by some to use them on the Japanese stubbornly defending Iwo Jima from caves and tunnels, where they would have been particularly vulnerable. He rejected the idea.
In the post-war era, Saddam Hussein employed chemical weapons against Iran and against the Kurds and other minorities in Iraq, while in 1995, a terrorist used a home-made nerve gas to attack commuters on the Tokyo subway system.
Labels:
Allies,
chemical,
China,
Germany,
inspectors,
Japan,
poison gas,
Saddam Hussein,
Syria,
UN,
warfare,
weapons,
World War One
Monday, 3 December 2012
Bhopal + 28 - protests and a museum
On the 28th
anniversary of the Bhopal chemical disaster, victims and their supporters held
rallies to complain that they have still not been adequately compensated. A march on the residence of a leading
politician to deliver a letter was halted by police.
Activists
complain that still no one has been properly called to account for the
disaster, in which poisonous methyl isocyanate gas leaked from Union Carbide’s
plant, killing perhaps 3,800 people in the immediate aftermath and causing
illness and death to many thousands more in the years that followed.
Meanwhile the ‘Remember
Bhopal Trust’ is setting up a mobile museum made up of articles donated by the
families of victims, including materials used in protests over the last 28
years. From December 2013, it will tour
India on a bus.
The curator says
they have refused any government funding, arguing the government ‘has no moral
authority to set up the museum as they were themselves a party to the gas
disaster.' (See also my blogs of Aug 1,
2009; June 7, and July 13, 2010.)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

